Montana
Lemon Law
Title 61,Chapter 4, Part 5
back
to map
61-4-501. Definitions.
For purposes of this part, the following
definitions apply:
(1) "Collateral
charge" means all governmental
charges, including but not limited
to sales tax, property tax, license
and registration fees, and fees in
lieu of tax.
(2) "Consumer"
means the purchaser, other than for
purposes of resale, of a motor vehicle
that has not been brought into nonconformity
as the result of abuse, neglect, or
unauthorized modifications or alterations
by the purchaser, any person to whom
the motor vehicle is transferred during
the duration of an express warranty
applicable to the motor vehicle, or
any other person entitled by the terms
of the warranty to the benefits of
its provisions.
(3) "Incidental
damage" means incidental and
consequential damage as defined in
30-2-715.
(4) "Manufacturer"
has the meaning applied to that word
in 61-4-201.
(5)(a)"Motor
vehicle" means a vehicle, including
the nonresidential portion of a motor
home as defined in 61-1-130, propelled
by its own power, designed primarily
to transport persons or property upon
the public highways, and sold or registered
in this state.
(b)The term does not include a truck
with 10,000 pounds or more gross vehicle
weight rating. Motor vehicle does
not include components, systems, fixtures,
appliances, furnishings, accessories,
and features that are designed, used,
and maintained primarily for residential
purposes.
(6) "Reasonable
allowance for use" is an amount
directly attributable to use of the
motor vehicle by the consumer and
any previous consumers prior to the
first written notice of the nonconformity
to the manufacturer or its agent and
during any subsequent period when
the vehicle is not out of service
because of nonconformity. The reasonable
allowance for use must be computed
by multiplying the total contract
price of the vehicle by a fraction
having as its denominator 100,000
and having as its numerator the number
of miles that the vehicle traveled
prior to the manufacturer's acceptance
of its return.
(7) "Warranty
period" means the period ending
2 years after the date of the original
delivery to the consumer of a new
motor vehicle or during the first
18,000 miles of operation, whichever
is earlier.
History: En. Sec.
1, Ch. 144, L. 1983; amd. Sec. 1,
Ch. 744, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 2, Ch.
300, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 360,
L. 2003.
61-4-502. Notice
-- warranty enforceable after warranty
period -- when.
(1) If a consumer
notifies in writing the manufacturer
or its agent during the warranty period
that a new motor vehicle does not
conform to all applicable express
warranties, the repairs necessary
to conform the new motor vehicle to
the express warranties shall be made
by or at the expense of the warrantor,
regardless of the expiration of the
warranty period after notification
of nonconformity is given by the consumer.
(2) The warranty
period of an express warranty is extended
to equal the time that repair services
are not available because of war or
invasion or because of strike or fire,
flood, or other natural disaster.
The presumption provided herein may
not apply against a manufacturer who
has not received prior written notification
from or on behalf of the consumer
and has not had an opportunity to
cure the alleged defect.
(3) The manufacturer
must clearly and conspicuously disclose
to the consumer in the warranty or
owner's manual that written notification
of a nonconformity is required before
a consumer may be eligible for a refund
or replacement of the vehicle. The
manufacturer must include with the
warranty or owner's manual the name
and address where the written notification
must be sent.
History: (1)En. Sec.
2, Ch. 144, L. 1983; (2)En. Sec. 5,
Ch. 144, L. 1983; amd. Sec. 2, Ch.
744, L. 1985.
61-4-503. Replacement
for nonconformity to warranty.
(1) If after a reasonable
number of attempts the manufacturer
or its agent or authorized dealer
is unable, during the warranty period,
to conform the new motor vehicle to
any applicable express warranty by
repairing or correcting any defect
or condition that substantially impairs
the use and market value or safety
of the motor vehicle to the consumer,
the manufacturer shall replace it
with a new motor vehicle of the same
model and style and of equal value,
unless for reasons of lack of availability
such replacement is impossible, in
which case the manufacturer shall
replace it with a vehicle of comparable
market value.
(2) As an alternative
to replacement, the manufacturer may
accept return of the new motor vehicle
from the consumer upon refund to him
of the full purchase price, plus reasonable
collateral charges and incidental
damages, less a reasonable allowance
for the consumer's use of the motor
vehicle. The refund shall be paid
to the consumer and to a lienholder,
if any, in proportion to their interests.
History: En. Sec.
3, Ch. 144, L. 1983; amd. Sec. 3,
Ch. 744, L. 1985.
61-4-504. Reasonable
number of attempts -- presumption.
A reasonable number of attempts to
conform a new motor vehicle to the
applicable express warranties is presumed
to have been made for purposes of
61-4-503(1) if:
(1) the same nonconformity
has been subject to repair four or
more times by the manufacturer or
its agent or authorized dealer during
the warranty period but the nonconformity
continues to exist; or
(2) the vehicle is
out of service because of nonconformity
for a cumulative total of 30 or more
business days during the warranty
period after notification of the manufacturer,
agent, or dealer.
History: En. Sec.
4, Ch. 144, L. 1983.
61-4-505. Dealer
exemption -- liability to manufacturer.
(1) Nothing in this
part imposes any liability on a dealer
or creates a cause of action by a
consumer against a dealer under 61-4-503.
(2) A dealer is not
liable to a manufacturer for any refunds
or vehicle replacements in the absence
of evidence indicating that repairs
made by the dealer were carried out
in a manner inconsistent with the
manufacturer's instructions.
History: En. Sec.
8, Ch. 144, L. 1983; amd. Sec. 4,
Ch. 744, L. 1985.
61-4-506. Provisions nonexclusive
-- applicability of U.C.C. -- defenses.
(1) The provisions
of this part do not limit the rights
or remedies available to a consumer
under any other law.
(2) All express warranties
arising from the sale of a new motor
vehicle are subject to the provisions
of Title 30, chapter 2, part 3.
(3) It is an affirmative
defense to a claim brought under this
part that an alleged nonconformity
does not substantially impair the
use, market value, or safety of the
vehicle or that the nonconformity
is the result of abuse, neglect, or
unauthorized modification or alteration
of a motor vehicle by the consumer.
History: En. Sec.
6, Ch. 144, L. 1983; amd. Sec. 5,
Ch. 744, L. 1985.
61-4-507. Exhaustion
of remedies under federal law. The
provisions of 61-4-503 are not applicable
against a manufacturer who has established
an informal dispute settlement procedure
certified by the department of administration
to be in substantial compliance with
the provisions of Title 16, Code of
Federal Regulations, part 703, as
those provisions read on October 1,
1983, unless the consumer has first
resorted to that procedure without
satisfaction.
History: En. Sec.
7, Ch. 144, L. 1983; amd. Sec. 6,
Ch. 744, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 195, Ch.
483, L. 2001.
61-4-508 through
61-4-510 reserved.
61-4-511. Manufacturer's
dispute settlement procedure -- certification
-- prohibited contents.
(1) A manufacturer
who has established an informal dispute
settlement procedure under the provisions
of Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations,
part 703 (16 CFR, part 703), as those
provisions read on October 1, 1983,
shall submit a copy of the procedure
to the department of administration.
The department of administration shall
issue a certificate of approval to
a manufacturer whose procedure complies
in all respects with the federal regulations
and subsection (2). The department
of administration shall report to
the department of justice all manufacturer's
procedures certified. The department
of administration may issue subpoenas
requiring the attendance of witnesses
and the production of records, documents,
or other evidence necessary to it
in an investigation related to the
certification of a manufacturer's
informal dispute settlement procedure.
(2) A manufacturer's
informal dispute settlement procedure
must afford the consumer or the consumer's
representative an opportunity to appear
and present evidence in Montana at
a location reasonably convenient to
the consumer and, further, may not
include any practices that:
(a) delay a decision
in any dispute beyond 60 days after
the date on which the consumer initially
resorts to the dispute settlement
procedure;
(b) delay performance of remedies
awarded in a settlement beyond 10
days after a decision, except that
a manufacturer may have 30 days following
the date of decision to replace a
motor vehicle or make refund to the
consumer as provided in 61-4-503;
(c) require the consumer to make the
vehicle available for inspection by
a manufacturer's representative more
than once;
(d) fail to consider in decisions
any remedies provided by this part;
or
(e) require the consumer to take any
action or assume any obligation not
specifically authorized under the
federal regulations referred to in
subsection (1).
History: En. Sec. 7, Ch. 744, L. 1985;
amd. Sec. 13, Ch. 503, L. 1985; amd.
Sec. 196, Ch. 483, L. 2001.
61-4-512. Annual
audit -- revocation or suspension
of certification.
(1) A manufacturer
establishing an informal dispute resolution
procedure shall file with the department
of administration a copy of the annual
audit required under Title 16, Code
of Federal Regulations, part 703 (16
CFR, part 703), as those provisions
read on October 1, 1983, along with
any additional information that the
department of administration may require,
including the number of refunds and
replacements made by the manufacturer
during the period audited.
(2) The department
of administration may, after notice
and hearing as provided in Title 2,
chapter 4, suspend or revoke the certification
of a manufacturer's informal dispute
resolution procedure upon a finding
that the procedure is being used to
create hardship to consumers. The
department of administration shall
notify the department of justice of
any revocation or suspension of a
certification. The department of administration
may consider the revocation or suspension
in licensing manufacturers under Title
61, chapter 4, part 2.
History: En. Sec.
8, Ch. 744, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 13,
Ch. 503, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 197, Ch.
483, L. 2001.
61-4-513 and 61-4-514
reserved.
61-4-515. Arbitration procedure.
(1) The department
of administration shall provide an
independent forum and arbitration
procedure for the settlement of disputes
between consumers and manufacturers
of motor vehicles that do not conform
to all applicable warranties under
the provisions of this part. The procedure
must conform to Title 27, chapter
5. All arbitration must take place
in Montana at a place reasonably convenient
to the consumer.
(2) Except as provided
in 61-4-520, a consumer owning a motor
vehicle that fails to conform to all
applicable warranties may bring a
grievance before an arbitration panel
only if the manufacturer of the motor
vehicle has not established an informal
dispute settlement procedure that
has been certified by the department
of administration under 61-4-511
History: En. Sec.
10, Ch. 744, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 23,
Ch. 744, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 198, Ch.
483, L. 2001.
61-4-516. Selection
of arbitrator. An arbitrator for a
grievance under this part must be
chosen by the department of administration.
The department of administration shall
maintain a list of persons willing
to serve as an arbitrator.
History: En. Sec.
11, Ch. 744, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 199,
Ch. 483, L. 2001; amd. Sec. 2, Ch.
360, L. 2003.
61-4-517. Implementation
of arbitration.
(1) A consumer may
initiate a request for arbitration
by filing a notice with the department
of administration. The consumer shall
file, on a form prescribed by the
department of administration, any
information considered relevant to
the resolution of the dispute and
shall return the form, along with
a $50 filing fee, within 5 days after
receiving it. The complaint form must
offer the consumer the choice of presenting
any subsequent testimony orally or
in writing, but not both.
(2) The department
of administration shall determine
whether the complaint alleges the
violation of any applicable warranty
under this part. If the department
of administration determines that
a complaint does not allege a warranty
violation, it shall refund the filing
fee.
(3) Upon acceptance
of a complaint, the department of
administration shall notify the manufacturer
of the filing of a request for arbitration
and shall obtain from the manufacturer,
on a form prescribed by the department
of administration, any information
considered relevant to the resolution
of the dispute. The manufacturer shall
return the form within 15 days of
receipt, with a filing fee of $250.
(4) Fees collected
under this section must be deposited
in a special revenue fund for the
use of the department of administration
in administering this part.
(5) The manufacturer's
fee provided in subsection (3) is
due only if the department of administration
arbitration procedures are used.
History: En. Sec.
12, Ch. 744, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 200,
Ch. 483, L. 2001.
61-4-518. Arbitration
-- role of department of administration
-- expert.
(1) The department
of administration shall investigate,
gather, and organize all information
necessary for a fair and timely decision
in each dispute. The department of
administration may, on behalf of the
arbitrator, issue subpoenas to compel
the attendance of witnesses and the
production of documents, papers, and
records relevant to the dispute.
(2) If requested
by the arbitrator, the department
of administration may forward a copy
of all written testimony and documentary
evidence to an independent technical
expert certified by the national institute
of automotive excellence. The expert
may review the material and be available
to advise and consult with the arbitrator.
The expert, at the arbitrator's request,
may be present whenever oral testimony
is presented.
History: En. Sec.
13, Ch. 744, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 13,
Ch. 503, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 201, Ch.
483, L. 2001; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 360,
L. 2003.
61-4-519. Action
by arbitrator -- decision.
(1) The arbitrator
shall, as expeditiously as possible,
but not later than 60 days after the
department of administration has accepted
a complaint, render a fair decision
based on the information gathered
and disclose the arbitrator's findings
and reasoning to the parties.
(2) The decision
shall provide appropriate remedies,
including but not limited to:
(a) repair of the
vehicle;
(b) replacement of the vehicle with
an identical vehicle or a comparable
vehicle acceptable to the consumer;
(c) refund as provided in 61-4-503
(2);
(d) any other remedies available under
the applicable warranties or 15 U.S.C.
2301 through 2312, as in effect on
October 1, 1983; or
(e) reimbursement of expenses and
costs to the prevailing party.
(3) The decision must specify a date
for performance and completion of
all awarded remedies. The department
of administration shall contact the
prevailing party within 10 working
days after the date for performance
to determine whether performance has
occurred. The parties shall act in
good faith in abiding by any decision.
In addition, if the decision is not
accepted, the parties shall follow
the provisions of Title 27, chapter
5. If it is determined by the court
that the appellant has acted without
good cause in bringing an appeal of
an award, the court, in its discretion,
may grant to the respondent costs
and reasonable attorney fees.
History: En. Sec.
14, Ch. 744, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 23,
Ch. 744, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 202, Ch.
483, L. 2001; amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 360,
L. 2003.
61-4-520. Nonconforming
procedure -- arbitration de novo.
A consumer injured by the operation
of any procedure that does not conform
with procedures established by a manufacturer
pursuant to 61-4-511 and the provisions
of Title 16, Code of Federal Regulations,
part 703, as in effect on October
1, 1983, may appeal any decision rendered
as the result of the procedure by
requesting arbitration de novo of
the dispute by a department of administration
panel. Filing procedures and fees
for appeals must be the same as those
required in 61-4-515 through 61-4-517.
The findings of the manufacturer's
informal dispute settlement procedure
are admissible in evidence at the
department of administration arbitration
panel hearing and in any civil action
arising out of any warranty obligation
or matter related to the dispute.
History: En. Sec.
16, Ch. 744, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 203,
Ch. 483, L. 2001.
61-4-521 through
61-4-524 reserved.
61-4-525. Notice
on resale of replaced vehicle. A motor
vehicle which is returned to the manufacturer
and which requires replacement or
refund may not be sold in the state
without a clear and conspicuous written
disclosure of the fact that the vehicle
was returned. The department of justice
may prescribe by rule the form and
content of the disclosure statement
and a procedure by which the disclosure
may be removed upon a determination
that the vehicle is no longer defective.
History: En. Sec.
9, Ch. 744, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 13,
Ch. 503, L. 1985.
61-4-526. Records
of disputes The department of administration
shall maintain records of each dispute
as it determines, including an index
of disputes by brand name and model.
The department of administration shall,
at intervals of no more than 6 months,
compile and maintain statistics indicating
the record of compliance with arbitration
decisions and the number of refunds
or replacements awarded. The statistical
summary must be considered by the
department of administration in determining
the issuance of any manufacturer license
required under Title 61, chapter 4,
part 2.
History: En. Sec.
15, Ch. 744, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 13,
Ch. 503, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 204, Ch.
483, L. 2001.
61-4-527 through
61-4-530 reserved.
61-4-531. Nondelegable.
The liabilities and obligations contained
in this part may not be delegated
or assigned to or assumed by any other
person or entity.
61-4-532. Rulemaking.
The department of administration may
adopt rules to implement the provisions
of this part.
History: En. Sec.
18, Ch. 744, L. 1985; amd. Sec. 205,
Ch. 483, L. 2001.
61-4-533. Penalty.
A violation of any provision of this
part is an unfair or deceptive trade
practice under Title 30, chapter 14,
part 2, and the penalties provided
in 30-14-224(1) apply.
History: En. Sec.
19, Ch. 744, L. 1985.