California Lemon Law - Home
California Lemon Law California Lemon Law - Home

The Problem: California Lemon Law


The problem is defective vehicles - lemons that consumers purchase or lease!

"Lemons" are vehicles with some sort of manufacturing defect that cannot be fixed by the dealer.


         
California Lemon Law Case Review Form
California Lemon Law: Frequently Asked Questions
 
 


Toyota: CALIFORNIA LEMON LAW

Got a defective Toyota?  Relax!  We’ll make the California lemon laws help you get rid of that defective Toyota Avalon lemon, defective Toyota Camry lemon, defective Toyota Camra Solara lemon, defective Toyota Corolla lemon, defective Toyota Matrix lemon, defective Toyota Prius lemon, defective Toyota Yaris lemon, defective Toyota Tacoma lemon, defective Toyota Tundra lemon, defective Toyota 4Runner lemon, defective Toyota FJ Cruiser lemon, defective Toyota Highlander lemon, defective Toyota Land Cruiser lemon, or defective Toyota RAV4 lemon.  California lemon laws were specifically created to protect the consumer. No need for you to struggle with headache and stress.  We will do a free analysis, explain the California lemon laws, let you know if your situation qualifies, and if so, our California lemon law attorneys will handle all the stress and headaches and fight for you to get your money back.

- Back to Index Page


Look-up your vehicle through the official NHTSA Recall Database - click here

 Toyota - current known lemon law problems, complaints, investigations, & recalls.     Fill out our Lemon Law Case Review Form below for a FREE
  analysis of your case, our California attorneys will contact you!
 
Toyota Camry

Summary:
ON CERTAIN VEHICLES, DUE TO IMPROPER ASSEMBLY OF THE AIR BAG INFLATOR, WHICH IS USED IN THE SIDE AIR BAG, THE CURTAIN SHIELD AIR BAG, AND THE KNEE AIR BAG ASSEMBLY, SOME INFLATORS WERE PRODUCED WITH AN INSUFFICIENT AMOUNT OF THE HEATING AGENTS NECESSARY FOR PROPER AIR BAG DEPLOYMENT. IN THIS CONDITION, THE EXPANSION FORCE OF THE GAS MAY BE INSUFFICIENT TO PROPERLY INFLATE THE AIR BAG WHEN THE SRS SYSTEM IS ACTIVATED DURING A CRASH.

Consequence:
THIS MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF INJURY TO THE OCCUPANT IN THE INVOLVED SEATING POSITION IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH.
 
Toyota Solara

Summary:
ON CERTAIN VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH CURTAIN SIDE AIR BAGS (CSA), THE CSA TETHER STRAP LOCATED IN THE FRONT PILLARS MAY HAVE BEEN INCORRECTLY ROUTED DURING THE ASSEMBLY PROCESS.

Consequence:
IF THE TETHER STRAP IS NOT CORRECTLY ROUTED, THE FRONT SIDE OF THE CSA MAY NOT DEPLOY AS DESIGNED, WHICH MAY RESULT IN INSUFFICIENT OCCUPANT PROTECTION DURING A SIDE IMPACT CRASH OR ROLLOVER EVENT.

 

Toyota Tacoma

Summary:
A DEFECT PETITION LETTER WAS RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF DEFECTS INVESTIGATION (ODI) REQUESTING A FORMAL INVESTIGATION OF MODEL YEAR (MY) 2006 AND 2007 TOYOTA TACOMA PICKUP TRUCKS FOR A POSSIBLE SAFETY DEFECT CAUSING SUDDEN AND UNCONTROLLED ACCELERATION. THE PETITIONER OWNS A MY 2006 TACOMA PICKUP TRUCK WITH AN AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION. THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED NEW IN MAY 2006 AND THE PETITIONER HAS BEEN THE PRIMARY DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE SINCE THAT TIME. NO ACCELERATION PROBLEMS WERE EXPERIENCED WITH THE VEHICLE FOR THE FIRST 24,500 MILES OF USE. ACCORDING TO THE PETITIONER, ON 1/5/2008 THE VEHICLE EXPERIENCED TWO SPONTANEOUS AND UNCONTROLLED ACCELERATIONS WITHIN TWO HOURS OF EACH OTHER. THESE INCIDENTS ARE DESCRIBED IN THE PETITIONER'S COMPLAINT FILED UNDER ODI 10214130. SUBSEQUENT TO THE INCIDENTS, THE PETITIONER CONDUCTED A REVIEW OF ODI'S COMPLAINT DATABASE FOR MY 2006 AND 2007 TOYOTA TACOMA AND OTHER U. S. LIGHT TRUCK MODELS FOR UNEXPLAINED ACCELERATION COMPLAINTS. THE PETITION WAS FILED BASED ON THIS REVIEW AND THE INCIDENTS THAT OCCURRED. IN AN INITIAL INTERVIEW ODI CONDUCTED ON 1/24/2008, THE PETITIONER FURTHER DESCRIBED THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE INCIDENTS AND THE REVIEW OF ODI'S COMPLAINT DATABASE. THE PETITIONER'S ASSESSMENT IS THAT THE BRAKE SYSTEM FUNCTIONED PROPERLY DURING BOTH INCIDENTS AND THAT A MALFUNCTION OR FAILURE OF THE THROTTLE CONTROL SYSTEM WAS THE LIKELY CAUSE (I. E., THAT THE THROTTLE OPENED WITHOUT ACCELERATOR APPLICATION). THE VEHICLE WAS IN NORMAL USE AT THIS TIME AND NO FURTHER UNWANTED ACCELERATIONS WERE REPORTED. ODI WILL EVALUATE THE PETITION FOR A GRANT OR DENY DECISION.

   
 
 Contact information
Name
Email
Phone
Address
City
State California only
Zip
 Vehicle Information
Year
Make
Model
Mileage
Please describe the problems you are having. Also include the number and type of repairs that have taken place to this point.
 

 
Toyota Sequoia

Summary:
IN A LETTER DATED JANUARY 18, 2007, TOYOTA NOTIFIED NHTSA OF A SAFETY DEFECT IN MODEL YEAR (MY) 2004 THROUGH 2006 TOYOTA TUNDRA AND MY 2004 THROUGH 2007 TOYOTA SEQUOIA VEHICLES PRODUCED BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 15, 2003 AND NOVEMBER 17, 2006 (NHTSA RECALL NO. 07V-013). ACCORDING TO TOYOTA, ¿IN THE FRONT SUSPENSION LOWER BALL JOINT ON THE SUBJECT VEHICLES, DUE TO POSSIBLE IMPROPER FINISHING OF THE BALL JOINT, SUCH AS THE ASPECT OF THE BALL STUD SURFACE, SOME BALL JOINTS MAY EXPERIENCE AN INCIDENTAL DETERIORATION OF THE INTERNAL LUBRICATION. THIS MAY CAUSE THE BALL JOINT TO WEAR AND LOOSEN PREMATURELY, WHICH COULD RESULT IN INCREASED STEERING EFFORT, REDUCED VEHICLE SELF-CENTERING, AND NOISE IN THE FRONT SUSPENSION. IN EXTREME CASES, IF THE VEHICLE IS CONTINUOUSLY OPERATED IN THIS CONDITION, THE LOWER BALL JOINT MAY SEPARATE FROM THE KNUCKLE AND COULD CAUSE LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL.¿ TOYOTA WILL INSTRUCT OWNERS TO RETURN THEIR VEHICLES TO ANY TOYOTA DEALER FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE FRONT SUSPENSION LOWER BALL JOINTS. THIS ENGINEERING ANALYSIS HAS BEEN CLOSED, AS TOYOTA IS RECALLING THE AFFECTED VEHICLES. ODI WILL MONITOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REMEDY AND TAKE FURTHER ACTION IF WARRANTED.
 

 

   
    • THE PROBLEM IS DEFECTIVE VEHICLES
The National Association of Consumer Agency Administrators and the Consumer Federation of America report that consumer complaints related to used car sales rank first, auto repair complaints rank third, and complaints related to new car sales rank fourth. In other words three of the top four consumer complaints, and consumer fraud complaints, involve cars.

Most states now have consumer protection laws, "lemon laws," pertaining to the purchase or lease of new vehicles, and under certain circumstances used vehicles. If your situation qualifies the manufacturer must make good on any vehicle which qualifies as a "lemon" which was purchased or leased for personal use, or most business uses.

The California Lemon Law Attorneys of Delsack and Associates will fight for you. Call 1-888-EX-LEMON now and get started! We have a nearly 100% success rate of the California Lemon Law cases we accept, and wherever you live in California you can put our 21 years of experience to work for you by making just one call.
 
    • A REPUTATION THAT WORKS

We are proud of our reputation for courteous, personal service and providing speedy responses to clients' inquiries. That's why our clients call us the best California lemon law firm.

Join our list of satisfied clients!

FREE California Lemon Law Case Review Form

Back to Home Page

Disclaimer


 Call or contact us today to get started on your California Lemon Law Case!


1.888.EXLEMON (1.888.395.3666)

    home problem! qualify? benefits process our fees to do about us faqs links contact  


2008 © Copyright - Law Offices of Delsack & Associates, P.C. All rights reserved.

California Lemon Law Attorney Specialists


Law Offices of Delsack & Associates, P.C.
1801 Century Park East, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Law Offices of Delsack & Associates, P.C.
130 Sutter Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, CA 94104
Law Offices of Delsack & Associates, P.C.
537 Newport Center Drive, #383
Newport Beach, CA 92660