Tag Archives: auto safety

Subaru EyeSight Collision Detection: Safety and Consumer Concerns

Posted on by

Subaru EyeSightSubaru’s EyeSight collision detection system is a significant advancement in automotive safety technology, offering drivers an extra layer of protection on the road. The technology works by utilizing a combination of cameras and sensors that detect vehicles ahead and objects surrounding the Subaru vehicle. If the system anticipates a potential collision, it intervenes by automatically reducing engine power, helping to mitigate the force of impact and potentially preventing accidents.

Which Subaru Cars Have EyeSight?

EyeSight technology is available across several models in Subaru’s lineup, including the Impreza, Outback, Legacy, Crosstrek, Ascent, Forester, and WRX. With its widespread adoption, many drivers have come to rely on EyeSight as a crucial safety feature, particularly in congested traffic or challenging driving conditions.

However, despite its touted benefits, Subaru EyeSight has not been without its share of problems and consumer complaints. In recent years, reports of issues with EyeSight technology have surfaced, prompting concerns among Subaru owners and leading to legal actions.

Problems and Consumer Complaints

A nationwide class-action lawsuit filed in New Jersey federal court highlighted serious allegations regarding defects in Subaru vehicles equipped with EyeSight driver assist technology. According to consumers, these defects pose significant safety risks, with complaints ranging from malfunctions in the lane assist function to problems with the automatic braking system. One recurring issue reported by drivers is the system’s tendency to engage without reason, causing the lane assist function to intervene unexpectedly. Such erratic behavior can lead to confusion and potentially hazardous driving situations, undermining the confidence that drivers place in the technology.

Another common complaint revolves around the automatic braking system, which is designed to intervene in emergencies to prevent collisions. However, some Subaru owners have reported instances where the system failed to activate when needed or, conversely, activated unnecessarily, leading to abrupt stops and potentially dangerous situations on the road.

“Eyesight Unavailable”

In addition to concerns about functionality, some drivers have encountered frustration with the system displaying an “Eyesight Unavailable” message. This message can appear for various reasons, including camera obstructions, adverse weather conditions, or technical malfunctions. While the intention behind this message is to ensure the system’s reliability, its occurrence can leave drivers feeling vulnerable and uncertain about their vehicle’s safety features.

Despite the challenges and consumer complaints surrounding Subaru EyeSight, it’s essential to recognize the ongoing efforts by Subaru and other automakers to enhance the safety and reliability of their advanced driver assistance systems. As technology continues to evolve, addressing these concerns and improving the functionality of collision detection systems will be paramount in ensuring the safety and confidence of drivers on the road.

VW & Audi – Fuel Tank Suction Pump Failure

Posted on by

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (Volkswagen) will be contacting the owners of certain front-wheel drive Volkswagen and Audi vehicles because the suction jet pump seal inside the fuel tank could fail. This failure could allow fuel to flow into the evaporative emissions (EVAP) system and possibly leak out of the charcoal canister.

The problems started in August 2016 when Volkswagen determined there was a defect affecting vehicles built with a specific suction jet pump. A Recall (16V-647) was issued and the affected vehicles received an improved version (Version 1.1) of suction jet pump.

In April 2018 Volkswagen started to receive their first reports of suction jet pump failures and an investigation was started. During an analysis of these warranty claims and customer complaints (VOQ’s), the evaluation of the field performance of the improved version of the suction jet pump indicated an increased failure rate. The topic was discussed at the Product Safety Committee’s of Volkswagen and Audi and a recall for all front wheel drive vehicles that have been equipped with the improved version was decided (based on 1410 warranty claims on FWD vehicles with repair dates between 05/01/2016 and 12/31/2023)

The vehicles affected include:
2015-2020 Audi A3 Sedan
2015-2019 Audi A3 Cabriolet
2019-2020 Volkswagen Jetta GLI
2018 Volkswagen Golf Sportwagen GP
2018-2019 Volkswagen Golf Sportwagen A7
2015-2017 Volkswagen Golf Sportwagen
2015-2020 Volkswagen Golf GTI
2015-2020 Volkswagen Golf A7

The recall remedy component is a redesigned suction jet pump (Version 2.0) and has incorporated multiple changes/improvements. The remedy part has the part number 5Q0.201.029 A, the recalled part has the part number 5Q0.201.029.

Owners receiving notices will be instructed to return to their dealers to have the suction pump replaced. Volkswagen’s numbers for this recall are VW: 20UF/Audi: 20YF. The NHTSA campaign number is 24V-110. Vehicles that were previously recalled under 16V-647 will need to have the new remedy completed.

The Steering Knuckle And Strut May Be Loose In Certain 2023 Ford Explorer Vehicles

Posted on by

In a recent announcement, Ford has highlighted a critical concern affecting a specific subset of its 2023 Ford Explorer vehicles. The issue revolves around the right-front lower fastener connecting the steering knuckle and strut, which may either be loose or missing altogether. This problem can have significant repercussions on the vehicle’s performance and safety.

A loose or missing connection between the knuckle and strut can lead to improper tire alignment, potentially causing steering pulls or requiring increased steering effort. Moreover, the proximity of the brake hose to the tire in this compromised setup poses an additional risk. If the hose comes into contact with the tire, it may sustain damage resulting in a brake fluid leak, ultimately leading to a loss of braking ability. These circumstances significantly elevate the likelihood of a crash, underscoring the severity of the situation.

Upon receiving a report of a missing fastener,Ford’s Critical Concern Review Group (CCRG) initiated an investigation at the beginning of January 2024. The Plant Vehicle Team (PVT) at the Assembly Plant promptly identified the issue during a routine warranty claim review. Further analysis revealed that the primary double spindle fixture tool responsible for securing the right front knuckle-to-strut fasteners was offline for repairs during a specific period. This temporary setback affected a limited number of vehicles, with Ford confirming that out of 121 Explorer rotations, only one vehicle was found to have a missing fastener. Nonetheless, the company is taking proactive steps to address the concern.

While Ford has not identified any vehicle owner questionnaires (VOQs) related to this condition, it’s crucial for affected vehicle owners to remain vigilant. Signs of potential issues include a visually detectable tire leaning inward at the top or changes in steering effort or pull. Additionally, if there are any indications of tire contact with the strut or spring seat, such as abrasion damage or a burning smell, prompt action is necessary.

In response to this concern, Ford has announced a field action to have the affected vehicles inspected. Dealers will thoroughly examine the fasteners and take appropriate measures, such as tightening or installing them as needed, to rectify the issue. Affected vehicle owners can reference Ford’s recall number 24S04 and the corresponding NHTSA campaign number 24V-091 for further information and to schedule inspections.

Importance of Keeping Records for Lemon Vehicles:

Maintaining detailed records of repairs and maintenance for your vehicle is essential, especially if you suspect that your vehicle might be a lemon. Lemon laws vary by jurisdiction, but generally, they provide recourse for consumers who have purchased a defective vehicle that the manufacturer has failed to repair adequately within a reasonable number of attempts.

Keeping comprehensive records serves several purposes. Firstly, it provides documentation of the issues you’ve experienced and the attempts made to address them, which can be crucial evidence if you need to pursue legal action under lemon laws. Additionally, it helps establish a pattern of recurring problems, strengthening your case for a vehicle replacement or refund.

Furthermore, detailed records can expedite the repair process by providing technicians with essential information about past issues and repairs. This can help diagnose and resolve problems more efficiently, minimizing inconvenience for you as the owner.

In summary, maintaining thorough records of repairs and maintenance is not only good practice for vehicle ownership but can also be invaluable if you find yourself grappling with a lemon. By documenting issues and repairs diligently, you empower yourself to assert your rights as a consumer and seek appropriate recourse if necessary.

Hyundai Kona Potential Engine Compartment Fire From Short Circuit

Posted on by

Hyundai Motor America (Hyundai) is initiating a recall for certain 2024 Kona models due to a potential risk of electrical short circuiting. This issue arises from the possibility of the battery cables rubbing against the engine control module bracket.

These vehicles are equipped with a 12-volt positive battery cable that could suffer damage during frontal collisions, leading to contact with the engine control module (ECM) bracket. This contact increases the likelihood of an electrical short, which could result in a fire in the engine compartment post-collision. Signs of this problem include smoke or a burning smell emanating from the engine area.

The issue first came to Hyundai’s attention in November 2023, following a report by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) about an engine compartment fire in a 2024 Hyundai Kona 1.6T-GDI AWD during a crash test. The IIHS observed smoke and flames emerging from the engine area shortly after the test. Their preliminary assessment indicated a short circuit in the ECM, which led to repeated reignitions. The situation was resolved after disconnecting the auxiliary battery. This incident prompted NASO to launch a new investigation.

A joint examination by NASO, HMC, HATCI, and IIHS revealed damage to the alternator and 12-volt positive power wiring beneath the ECM, with exposed copper cores. The ECM bracket was found pressing against the 12-volt positive battery cable, believed to have shifted during the crash and caused the electrical short leading to the fires.

In response, Hyundai conducted crash tests in December with newly designed sheathing to protect the 12-volt positive wiring from shorting due to ECM bracket contact. These tests were successful, showing no damage or electrical shorting. Consequently, HMA’s NASO decided to recall the affected Kona vehicles.

To date, there have been no reported crashes, injuries, or deaths related to this issue, except for the single fire incident during the IIHS test. Hyundai is unaware of any field incidents. Vehicle owners will be notified to return their vehicles to Hyundai dealers for the installation of protective sheathing over the wiring. The recall is designated as number 252, with NHTSA campaign number 23V-900.

Aftermarket Steering Wheel Decal Safety Warning

Posted on by

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has recently issued a cautionary statement regarding the use of aftermarket steering wheel decals. They are alerting vehicle owners to the potential safety risks associated with these popular accessories. This advisory, while not directly related to Lemon Law issues, underscores the importance of prioritizing safety in vehicle modifications.

The NHTSA’s Concern

The center of NHTSA’s advisory lies in the potential hazards that steering wheel decals pose. Often crafted from materials such as vinyl or plastic, these decorative additions can interfere with the steering system’s safety features, particularly airbags and control buttons. In extreme scenarios, such interference might hinder airbag deployment in accidents, elevating the risk of driver injury.

A Safety Perspective

The NHTSA’s warning provides an essential distinction between manufacturer defects covered under Lemon Laws and aftermarket modifications made by vehicle owners. Lemon Laws are designed to protect consumers from manufacturer-related issues, but do not extend to aftermarket alterations like steering wheel decals. This distinction is critical as it places the responsibility for any resulting safety issues on the owner post-modification.

Safety Risks of Steering Wheel Decals

While steering wheel decals might appear to be a simple cosmetic enhancement, they can inadvertently impact a vehicle’s safety. These decals can obscure important warning labels or indicators, potentially causing confusion. Additionally, they may alter the feel and function of control buttons, leading to distraction or delayed reactions from the driver in crucial moments.

Manufacturer Warnings and Warranty Concerns

Vehicle manufacturers often advise against modifications that could affect safety feature functionality. Installing aftermarket steering wheel decals could lead to warranty voidance, particularly if these modifications contribute to any system malfunctions or failures. Vehicle owners should consider this potential impact on their warranty coverage before proceeding with such modifications.

Making Informed Choices: Safety vs. Aesthetics

NHTSA encourages vehicle owners to consider safety implications ahead of aesthetic preferences when modifying their vehicles. For those still looking to customize their steering wheels, there are safer alternatives. Options like custom stitching or accessories approved by the manufacturer can provide personalization without sacrificing safety.

Prioritizing Safety in Vehicle Customization

To sum up, while aftermarket steering wheel decals are not a Lemon Law matter, their influence on vehicle safety cannot be overlooked. The NHTSA’s warning is a vital reminder for consumers to carefully consider the safety implications of any vehicle customization. Remember, when it comes to modifying your vehicle, ensuring that aesthetics do not compromise safety is crucial. In the realm of vehicle customization, it’s always better to err on the side of caution.

Volkswagen ID.4 Door Handle Malfunction

Posted on by

Door handle water intrusion Recent developments in automotive safety have brought to light a significant issue with the 2021-2023 Volkswagen ID.4 models. These vehicles have been identified as having door handles that fall short of the required standards for water ingress protection. This defect poses a serious safety risk, as it can lead to malfunctions in the door lock system, causing doors to open unexpectedly.

The Central Safety Concern

The main safety hazard is the risk of doors opening spontaneously under high lateral forces, particularly at speeds below 9 mph (15 km/h). This can be dangerous for both the vehicle’s occupants and those outside, including pedestrians and nearby objects. The problem stems from water entering the printed circuit board within the door handle, leading to miscommunications with the door control unit.

Signs of the Malfunction

Drivers and passengers in the affected Volkswagen ID.4 models may notice an unusual clicking sound, similar to that of doors locking or unlocking, which can indicate the onset of this issue.

Timeline of the Volkswagen ID.4 Door Handle Issue

  • June 2021: The first signs of this issue in the Volkswagen ID.4 were reported in the U.S., with two cases of door openings. Investigations pointed to wiring harness damage as a cause of water ingress.
  • April 2022: Additional reports confirmed the presence of water in the circuit board.
  • April-November 2022: Volkswagen conducted in-depth analyses using malfunctioning parts, signal debugging, and accelerated aging tests.
  • November 2022: Tests on field vehicles identified the issue at speeds below 15 km/h.
  • January-February 2023: In collaboration with suppliers, Volkswagen analyzed and tested deconstructed field parts.
  • February 2023: Environmental tests commenced on serial parts to better understand the ingress of water.
  • February 28, 2023: The NHTSA called for a meeting with VWGoA to discuss the ID.4 door handle issue.
  • March 2023: Continued investigations by VWGoA and NHTSA, with no definitive root cause identified initially.
  • March 28, 2023: Completion of climate chamber tests led to the identification of the root cause.
  • April 2023: Volkswagen’s Product Safety Committee started identifying affected ID.4 vehicles.

Recall Decision and Implications

By April 26, 2023, Volkswagen’s Product Safety Committee had decided to recall the affected 2021-2023 ID.4 models, following 28 reported instances of door openings. This recall is a vital step in rectifying a crucial safety defect, highlighting the need for stringent quality control and proactive measures in the automotive industry.

2020-2023 Ford Mustang No Low Brake Fluid Warning

Posted on by

brake light warningSome Mustang cars made between 2020 and 2023 have a problem with their brake fluid level sensor. This sensor doesn’t activate a warning light when the brake fluid is low. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards for light vehicle brake systems.

Ford became aware of the problem in August 2023 when an issue pertaining to 2020-2023 model year Mustang brake fluid level warning systems was brought into Ford’s Critical Concern Review Group (CCRG) for review. They discovered that the problem lies with the Body Control Module (BCM), a part that manages the brake fluid sensor. This BCM should turn on the brake warning light if there’s a problem. In Mustangs made from 2018 to 2023, the brake fluid sensor is directly connected to the BCM. However, in the 2020 Mustang, they switched to a different BCM design, called “Gen1m,” which incorrectly looks for a message from the brake fluid sensor over a network (CAN) instead of the direct connection.

After investigating, Ford confirmed that this problem only affects Mustangs from 2020 to 2023. They also verified that the 2024 Mustang doesn’t have this issue because the brake system and BCM are set up correctly. The Brake Development team tested Mustangs from 2019 to 2024 and found that the 2020 to 2023 models fail to meet the requirements for warning about low brake fluid. However, these vehicles meet all other brake system warning lamp requirements.

Ford initially didn’t run certification tests on the 2020 to 2023 Mustangs because they thought the brake system was the same as in the 2018 model. They didn’t know that the BCM was incorrectly configured to use a network message.

As of September 12, 2023, Ford received 123 warranty claims related to a brake fluid loss on these vehicles, but there were no reports of the brake fluid level sensor not working.

To fix the problem, Ford dealers will update the software in the body control module. They plan to send out initial letters in December 2023 to notify owners about the safety issue and will send second letters when the solution is available. This recall is identified by Ford as number 23C35, and the NHTSA campaign number is 23V-727.

Ford Mustang Mach E Battery Contactor Could Overheat

Posted on by

Certain 2021-2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E cars might face a power problem due to an overheated high voltage battery contactor, potentially leading to an increased risk of accidents.

In June 2022, Ford’s Field Review Committee (FRC) gave the green light to a Field Service Action (FSA) named 22S41, specifically designed to tackle concerns regarding the overheating of the high voltage battery main contactor in select 2021-2022 Mustang Mach-E vehicles. To fix this issue, dealers updated the software for the Secondary On-Board Diagnostic Control Module (SOBDMC) and the Battery Energy Control Module (BECM). The enhanced SOBDMC software keeps an eye on the contactor’s temperature and smartly reduces the battery’s power output to prevent further damage. Meanwhile, the upgraded BECM software checks the contactor’s resistance to identify any damage, then it generates a diagnostic trouble code (DTC) and lowers the vehicle’s power to avoid more harm.

At the time of approving this FSA, Ford’s Critical Concern Review Group (CCRG) and Electrical Propulsion Engineering (EPE) teams found the software updates for BECM and SOBDMC to be a suitable way to minimize the safety risks linked to power loss. The software update, by monitoring contactor resistance, warns customers if the resistance exceeds a certain limit. Alongside the warning, the software reduces power to prevent further contactor damage and the associated power loss risk. Even with the reduced power, customers can safely accelerate to highway speeds. This approach was also reviewed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

In June 2022, Ford Motor Company decided to issue a safety recall (NHTSA Recall 22V-412) for 48,924 model year 2021-2022 Ford Mustang Mach-E vehicles produced between May 27, 2020, and May 24, 2022. This recall was prompted by concerns about high voltage battery contactors overheating, primarily due to direct current (DC) fast-charging and repeated full-throttle pedal events. This overheating could lead to arcing or deformation of the electrical contact surfaces. If this occurs, the contactor could either remain open or get welded shut. An overheated contactor that opens while driving may lead to an immediate loss of power without re-engagement.

Following consumer complaints, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) initiated a Recall Query (RQ) for 2021-2022 Ford Mach-E vehicles included in Recall 22V-412. These vehicles had previously received a remedy involving a Secondary On-Board Diagnostic Control Module (SOBDMC) software update to monitor contactor temperature and reduce battery power to protect the contactor, as well as a Battery Energy Control Module (BECM) software update to monitor contactor resistance and reduce vehicle power in case of an overheated contactor.

To address this issue, dealers will replace the high voltage battery junction box. This recall is identified by Ford as 23S56, and the corresponding NHTSA campaign number is 22V-687. Vehicles included in this recall that were previously repaired under recall 22V-412 will need to have the new remedy completed.