<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>California Lemon Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog</link>
	<description>A Blog by the Law Offices of Delsack and Associates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Chrysler Minivan Liftgate Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3118</link>
		<comments>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3118#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto Recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automobile Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electrical problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturer defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety Recalls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chrysler will be recalling a small number of <a href="http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/recall/?make=CHRYSLER&#038;model=TOWN+AND+COUNTRY&#038;year=2012">2012 Chrysler Town and Country</a> and <a href="http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/recall/?make=DODGE&#038;model=GRAND+CARAVAN&#038;year=2012">2012 Dodge Grand Caravan</a> minivans because the lift gate pinch sensor may not function properly.  According to the recall report filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), an increased force may be needed to stop the power liftgate during the final closing stages and consumers could be injured if the door closes on an appendage.  Owners receiving a notice can take their vehicle to their Chrysler of Dodge dealership to get the pinch sensor replaced.  For more information about the problem contact Chrysler at 1-800-853-1403.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrysler will be recalling a small number of <a href="http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/recall/?make=CHRYSLER&#038;model=TOWN+AND+COUNTRY&#038;year=2012">2012 Chrysler Town and Country</a> and <a href="http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/recall/?make=DODGE&#038;model=GRAND+CARAVAN&#038;year=2012">2012 Dodge Grand Caravan</a> minivans because the lift gate pinch sensor may not function properly.  According to the recall report filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), an increased force may be needed to stop the power liftgate during the final closing stages and consumers could be injured if the door closes on an appendage.  Owners receiving a notice can take their vehicle to their Chrysler or Dodge dealership to get the pinch sensor replaced.  For more information about the problem contact Chrysler at 1-800-853-1403.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3118</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inaccurate Reverse In Ford Transmission</title>
		<link>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3114</link>
		<comments>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3114#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto Recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automobile Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln Recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturer defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety Recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transmission problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automobile recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln Navigator recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transmission problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transmission recall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ford has announced that they will be recalling certain vehicles because the transmission range selector (TRS) may have been calibrated out of specification for reverse gear.  The transmission may not go into reverse as expected, “R” may not be illuminated on the dashboard to signal to the driver that the vehicle is in reverse, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford has announced that they will be recalling certain vehicles because the transmission range selector (TRS) may have been calibrated out of specification for reverse gear.  The transmission may not go into reverse as expected, “R” may not be illuminated on the dashboard to signal to the driver that the vehicle is in reverse, and the back up lights may not illuminate when the vehicle is in reverse.  These conditions will increase the chance of injury for drivers and pedestrians.  Ford will be notifying owners of the problem starting at the end of June, and dealers will inspect and replace the TRS as necessary.  Owners wanting more information about the problem can contact Ford Motor Company Customer Relationship Center at 1-866-436-7332.   The vehicles involved in the recall include:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/recall/?make=FORD&#038;model=F-150&#038;year=2011">2011-2012 Ford F-150</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/recall/?make=FORD&#038;model=EXPEDITION&#038;year=2012">2012 Expedition</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/recall/?make=LINCOLN&#038;model=NAVIGATOR&#038;year=2012">2012 Lincoln Navigator</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/recall/?make=FORD&#038;model=MUSTANG&#038;year=2013">2012-2013 Mustang</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3114</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Decision Reversed In Fuel Economy Case</title>
		<link>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3108</link>
		<comments>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3108#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 17:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battery Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Lemon Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U. S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automobile emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automobile industry in California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Lemon Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuel problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel-efficient cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda Civic hybrid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Los Angeles County judge has reversed a court decision to award a former attorney almost $10,000 over fuel economy claims for her 2006 Honda Civic. The case received national attention last year, when Heather Peters opted out of a class action settlement that would have paid Civic hybrid owners up to $200 or $1000 off  the purchase of a new car.  Honda appealed the court decision, and Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Dudley W. Gray reversed the small-claims judgment last Thursday. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Los Angeles County judge has reversed a court decision to award a former attorney almost $10,000 over fuel economy claims for her 2006 Honda Civic. The case received national attention last year, when Heather Peters opted out of a class action settlement that would have paid Civic hybrid owners up to $200 or $1000 off  the purchase of a new car.  Honda appealed the court decision, and Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Dudley W. Gray reversed the small-claims judgment last Thursday. </p>
<p>According to Gray, the automaker was within its rights to advertise the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) fuel economy ratings for the vehicle and rejects the idea that it was misleading.  He added that Federal regulations control the fuel economy ratings posted on vehicles, but they are only there for comparison among vehicles and don&#8217;t take into account conditions that could affect fuel economy such as how people drive and the condition of their vehicle.</p>
<p>Peters lawsuit has prompted almost 40 other Civic owners to seek similar recourse.  Honda has already won 18 of the suits and has lost one case, in Santa Barbara, involving a 2003 Civic hybrid.  Peters said that although she is disappointed with the final ruling, she is glad she raised awareness that Honda is no longer the great brand it used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3108</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BMW 3 Series Head Restraint Safety</title>
		<link>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3106</link>
		<comments>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3106#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto Recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automobile Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturer defect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety Recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automobile recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW 3-Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head restraint problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BMW has announced that they will be recalling certain 2012 3-Series vehicles because the head restraints fail to comply with the Federal motor vehicle safety standards.  According to the recall report, when the head rest is in the highest position it exceeds the downward movement limitations of 25mm.  The head restraint could move [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BMW has announced that they will be recalling certain <a href="http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/recall/?make=BMW&#038;model=3-SERIES&#038;year=2012">2012 3-Series</a> vehicles because the head restraints fail to comply with the Federal motor vehicle safety standards.  According to the recall report, when the head rest is in the highest position it exceeds the downward movement limitations of 25mm.  The head restraint could move down during a crash, increasing the risk of neck injuries.  BMW will be notifying owners in May and will correct the problem by attaching a clamp to the front seat head restraint posts.  Owners wanting more information about the problem can contact BMW customer relations and services at 1-800-525-7417. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3106</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrysler Brake And Stability Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3099</link>
		<comments>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3099#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto Recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Automobile Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electrical problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety Recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brake problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-lock braking system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automobile recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic stability control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?p=3099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chrysler has announced that they will be recalling certain <a href="http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/recall/?make=CHRYSLER&#038;model=300&#038;year=2012">2011-2012 Chrysler 300</a> and <a href="http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/recall/?make=DODGE&#038;model=CHARGER&#038;year=2012">2011-2012 Dodge Charger</a> vehicles for electrical problems.  According to Chrysler, the plastic insert surrounding the fuse for the power distribution center could distort due thermal expansion and contraction.  This distortion could interrupt power to the anti-locking braking system (ABS) and electronic stability control (ESC) system, making them inoperable.  Chrysler will fix the problem by relocating the fuse to a cooler area.  Owners wanting more information about the problem can contact Chrysler at 1-800-853-1403. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrysler has announced that they will be recalling certain <a href="http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/recall/?make=CHRYSLER&#038;model=300&#038;year=2012">2011-2012 Chrysler 300</a> and <a href="http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/recall/?make=DODGE&#038;model=CHARGER&#038;year=2012">2011-2012 Dodge Charger</a> vehicles for electrical problems.  According to Chrysler, the plastic insert surrounding the fuse for the power distribution center could distort due thermal expansion and contraction.  This distortion could interrupt power to the anti-locking braking system (ABS) and electronic stability control (ESC) system, making them inoperable.  Chrysler will fix the problem by relocating the fuse to a cooler area.  Owners wanting more information about the problem can contact Chrysler at 1-800-853-1403. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lemonlawspecialists.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3099</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

