Chrysler (FCA) will be contacting the owners of certain 2021-2024 Jeep Wrangler and 2022-2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee over a failure to comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) related to windshield defrosting and defogging systems. Owners of affected vehicles are urged to take immediate action to rectify this potentially hazardous issue.

In June 2023, FCA Technical Safety and Regulatory Compliance (TSRC) organization received reports indicating a potential malfunction in the windshield defrost system of certain 2021-2024 Jeep Wrangler Plug In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) and 2022-2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee PHEVs. This issue raised concerns about the vehicles’ compliance with FMVSS.

An investigation conducted by FCA determined that a subset of these vehicles may have been built with incorrectly programmed hybrid control processor (HCP) software. This flaw could result in the disabling of the windshield defrost system under specific conditions. The affected period for the Jeep Wrangler spans from September 2, 2020, to August 24, 2023, while for the Jeep Grand Cherokee, it extends from July 23, 2021, to December 5, 2023.

A disabled windshield defrost system poses a significant safety risk, as it can impair outward visibility during critical driving conditions, potentially leading to accidents. In response to this safety concern, FCA has initiated a voluntary safety recall of the affected vehicles.

To address the issue, authorized dealerships will update the HCP software to rectify the programming error. This corrective action aims to restore the proper functioning of the windshield defrosting and defogging systems, ensuring optimal visibility and driving safety for affected vehicle owners and occupants. This recall, identified as recall number 04B by Chrysler, carries the NHTSA campaign number 24V-111.

Jeep Wrangler 4XE The Jeep Wrangler 4XE plug-in hybrid has faced a series of challenges that have left many owners questioning the reliability of their vehicles. Reports from owners highlight a range of issues, from stalling engines that cannot be restarted to transmission errors, battery defects, and more serious safety concerns.

One common complaint among Wrangler 4XE owners is the vehicle’s tendency to stall unexpectedly, leaving drivers unable to restart the car. This issue is not just inconvenient but poses a significant safety risk, especially if it occurs in traffic or remote areas. Additionally, there have been reports of defective batteries and blown fuses, further contributing to the vehicle’s unreliability.

Transmission problems are another significant issue, with some owners experiencing leaks and errors, alongside instances where the shifter becomes stuck in park, rendering the vehicle immobile. Warning lights, such as the check engine light and power steering light, frequently accompany these mechanical failures, along with messages indicating the need to “Service Electronic Stability.”

Charging issues have also been a point of frustration. Errors like “Service Charging System” have been reported, alongside malfunctions in the Power Inverter Module (PIM), further complicating the ownership experience. In some cases, these electrical issues lead to a complete loss of power, preventing the vehicle from starting.

More alarming are reports of oil leaks from the exhaust and rear undercarriage, with one vehicle diagnosed with a bad pinion seal on the rear axle at merely 241 miles on the odometer. The recurrence of such leaks, accompanied by smoke and the potential risk of fire, underscores the severity of the Wrangler 4XE’s problems.

The erratic behavior of the vehicle’s transmission and propulsion systems, including sudden stops in the middle of highways and unintended acceleration that has led to property damage, raises significant concerns about the safety and reliability of the Jeep Wrangler 4XE.

For owners facing these daunting issues, California’s Lemon Law provides a beacon of hope. This law is designed to protect consumers who have purchased or leased new vehicles covered by a manufacturer’s new vehicle warranty. If a vehicle proves to be defective and cannot be repaired after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer is required to either replace the vehicle or refund the purchase price to the consumer.

Under the California Lemon Law, owners of the Jeep Wrangler 4XE experiencing repeated failures that substantially impair the vehicle’s use, value, or safety may be entitled to relief. It’s essential for affected owners to keep detailed records of all repairs and attempts made to address the issues, as these documents will be crucial in pursuing a lemon law claim.

The myriad of problems faced by Jeep Wrangler 4XE owners highlights the challenges in the automotive industry’s shift towards electrification, especially in models that are expected to perform under the demanding conditions for which Jeeps are renowned. For those grappling with these defects, understanding and utilizing the protections offered by the Lemon Law can provide a pathway to resolution and ensure that manufacturers are held accountable for the reliability and safety of their vehicles.

The Volkswagen Group of America, operating under its Audi brand, has recently identified a critical issue in a range of its electric vehicle models. This issue revolves around the charging system, specifically the high-voltage battery modules, raising concerns about potential overheating and fire safety risks.

Affected Models

The problem affects several Audi models between 2019 and 2024, including the RS e-tron GT, e-tron GT, Q4 e-tron Sportback, Q4 e-tron, Audi A8, e-tron Quattro, e-tron Sportback Quattro, Q5, and A7.

Overheating High-Voltage Battery Modules

The central issue lies in the high-voltage battery modules, which are prone to overheating. This has been especially evident when charging with the industrial 220V/240V plug at a current of 40 amperes. Crucially, Investigations revealed that the charging equipment itself was not at fault. Instead, the issue often stemmed from household power outlets and wiring incapable of handling the required current, leading to overheating of the home infrastructure.

Initial Discovery and Response

The issue first came to light in April 2020, following a fire incident outside the U.S. Audi collaborated with their high-voltage battery supplier, LG Energy Solutions, to investigate. By mid-2023, a noticeable increase in thermal events led to a deeper examination. Despite a service campaign in April 2022 that included a software update for cell module balancing, issues persisted.

Recall and Remedial Actions

In response, Audi initiated a voluntary global safety recall, designated 93U9 by Audi and 23V-867 by the NHTSA. The recall includes installing onboard diagnostic software to monitor battery module performance and replacing affected modules as necessary. Interim notification letters are scheduled for February 2024, with a detailed follow-up expected in the third quarter of the same year.

Charging Cable Replacement

A significant aspect of the recall is the replacement of the power cable used for industrial sockets (220V/240V/NEMA 14-50). The existing cable (part number 7PP971678 ED) will be replaced with a new design (part number 7PP971678GA), featuring temperature sensors. These cables should be available in the second quarter of 2024.

Safety Concerns and User Guidance

Owners of affected models are advised to be cautious, especially when using industrial sockets for charging. The overheating issue can cause not only damage to the charging cable but also pose a risk to household electrical infrastructure. If the problem exists, users may notice the charging cable feeling hot to the touch after use.

This recall underscores the importance of matching electric vehicle charging systems with compatible household wiring. Audi’s proactive steps in addressing this issue highlight their commitment to customer safety and the integrity of their electric vehicle line. Owners of the affected models are encouraged to heed recall notices and ensure their home charging setups are compatible and safe.

The charging issue identified in Audi’s electric vehicles bears notable similarities to the Chevrolet Bolt recall (21V-650). In both cases, the central concern revolves around the battery systems and the associated risk of overheating, which could potentially lead to fire hazards. The Chevrolet Bolt recall, much like Audi’s, involved issues with high-voltage battery packs that were found to be prone to catching fire. Both recalls necessitated substantial corrective actions, including software updates, close monitoring of battery performance, and in some cases, the replacement of battery modules. Furthermore, these incidents highlight a broader challenge in the electric vehicle industry, emphasizing the need for more robust and safe battery technologies and charging infrastructures. Such parallels underline the growing pains of electric vehicle technology and the critical importance of ensuring safety as these vehicles become increasingly prevalent.

Chevy Blazer EV Stop Delivery

General Motors (GM) has announced an immediate stop delivery order for certain 2024 model vehicles, including the Chevrolet Blazer, Chevrolet Blazer EV, Chevrolet Equinox, and GMC Terrain vehicles. This decision, taken as a precautionary measure to ensure customer satisfaction and vehicle reliability.

The specific issue prompting this stop delivery order has not been publicly disclosed by General Motors. The order is categorized under “Global Safety Field Investigations,” suggesting that GM is actively working to identify and rectify the underlying problem. The lack of detailed information at this stage highlights the company’s cautious approach in handling potential vehicle issues.

Affected vehicles have been identified through their Vehicle Identification Numbers (VINs), with a clear directive that these vehicles should not be sold or delivered by dealers until further details and solutions are provided. This restriction also prohibits dealer trades, auction releases, demonstration uses, or any other dealership activities involving these models. To facilitate this process, GM has updated the Investigate Vehicle History (IVH) screen in the Global Warranty Management (GWM) system, which now tags the affected vehicles with a “Stop Delivery” status and labels the VIN as “Incomplete Remedy Not Available.”

One significant concern that has emerged is related to software issues in the 2024 Chevrolet Blazer EV, which uses GM’s advanced Ultium battery system. A small number of Blazer EV owners have reported issues with the software quality, prompting Chevrolet to temporarily halt sales and deliveries of this model. This pause is intended to ensure that the vehicles delivered meet GM’s high standards for quality and reliability. Notably, the software problems cannot be resolved through an over-the-air (OTA) update, necessitating a visit to the dealership for service.

GM has assured customers and stakeholders that these software issues are not safety-related and do not pertain to the Ultium battery system or the Google Built-in features. The engineering teams at GM are actively working on a solution. Affected vehicle owners will be contacted by GM with instructions on scheduling their software updates.

This stop delivery order, labeled under GM number N232429910, is a measure by GM to preemptively address potential issues before they impact customers. As the situation evolves, GM is expected to provide further updates and guidance to both dealerships and vehicle owners.

General Motors (GM) has recently identified a significant safety defect in some of its electric vehicles (EVs). This issue, affecting specific 2023-2024 model year GMC Hummer EV Pickups, 2024 GMC Hummer EV SUVs, and certain 2024 Chevrolet Silverado EVs, revolves around a crucial component of vehicle safety: the seat belt.

Discovery and Investigation of the Defect

In August 2023, a GM seat engineer, utilizing the company’s Speak Up for Safety (SUFS) program, reported a potential flaw after being alerted by GM’s seat supplier. The concern was about a loose front seat belt buckle bolt in a seat built for a 2024 HUMMER EV. This prompted GM to initiate a thorough product investigation.

Working closely with the supplier, GM discovered that the assembly process might not have been consistently adhered to, leading to possible out-of-sequence torquing of seat frame assembly bolts. This irregularity could result in the seat belt buckle attachment bolt not being tightened to the required specifications. After reviewing the supplier’s manufacturing records, GM identified seat frame assemblies that deviated from the intended assembly order.

Upon inspecting 754 suspect seats, GM and the supplier found two seats with improperly torqued attachment bolts. Fortunately, as of now, GM is not aware of any accidents or injuries related to this condition.

The Importance of Seat Belt Safety

The seat belt is a fundamental safety device in any vehicle, designed to protect occupants in the event of a collision or sudden stop. A properly functioning seat belt system can significantly reduce the risk of serious injury or death during an accident. It’s a vital line of defence, ensuring that passengers are securely restrained and minimizing their movement during a crash.

The Recall and Corrective Measures

In November, GM’s Safety and Field Action Decision Authority decided to conduct a safety recall. Vehicle owners will be notified and advised to return to their dealers for inspection. The specific focus will be on tightening the left and right front seat belt buckle attachment bolts.

Owners of affected vehicles may notice a rattle near the seat belt buckle, signalling the potential issue. It is crucial for owners to heed this warning and take prompt action.

GM has designated the recall number as N232419280, and it is also recognized under the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) campaign number 23V-786.

This recall by GM underscores the importance of stringent quality control and responsive safety measures in the automotive industry. The seat belt, a simple yet vital safety component, must meet the highest standards of reliability. GM’s action in addressing this issue serves as a reminder of the ongoing need for vigilance and regular vehicle maintenance to ensure the safety of all road users.

A small number of 2023 Chrysler Pacifica Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV) have encountered a significant safety issue, prompting concerns and a recall. A flaw in the battery system could potentially lead to vehicle fires, a risk that poses a serious threat to both vehicle occupants and property.

At the core of the problem is an off-location 12V isolator post in some of these vehicles. This defect may cause a short circuit in the 12V battery positive (“B+”) circuit, leading to a vehicle fire, regardless of whether the ignition is on or off. The gravity of this issue is evident, as vehicle fires can significantly increase the risk of injury to both the occupants and bystanders, as well as cause extensive property damage.

In response to this discovery, FCA US (Fiat Chrysler Automobiles United States) has initiated a voluntary safety recall for all affected Chrysler Pacifica PHEV models. This recall, identified as B0A by FCA US and 23V-753 in the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) campaign, aims to address this critical issue.

It’s important to note that the recall stems not from a defective part, but rather from an assembly issue. Specifically, the vehicles in question may have been built with a 12V anti-rotation stud that is incorrectly positioned. The solution involves modifying the isolator to correctly fit this anti-rotation stud, thereby mitigating the risk of a short circuit and subsequent fire.

In the meantime, owners of the affected vehicles are strongly advised to take precautionary measures. FCA US recommends that these vehicles should not be parked inside buildings, structures, or near other vehicles. The reason for this guidance is clear: to minimize the risk of fire spreading and causing further damage and potential injuries. Owners are encouraged to park their vehicles outdoors and away from structures until the necessary repairs are completed.

This recall and the associated risks highlight the complexities and potential dangers inherent in modern automotive technologies, particularly in hybrid and electric vehicles. While these technologies offer numerous benefits, including environmental advantages, they also introduce new challenges in terms of vehicle safety and reliability.

The Chrysler Pacifica PHEV’s recall serves as a reminder of the importance of stringent quality control and thorough testing in vehicle manufacturing. It also underscores the need for quick and decisive action by manufacturers and regulatory bodies when potential safety issues are identified, ensuring the safety and well-being of vehicle users and the general public.

Door handle water intrusion Recent developments in automotive safety have brought to light a significant issue with the 2021-2023 Volkswagen ID.4 models. These vehicles have been identified as having door handles that fall short of the required standards for water ingress protection. This defect poses a serious safety risk, as it can lead to malfunctions in the door lock system, causing doors to open unexpectedly.

The Central Safety Concern

The main safety hazard is the risk of doors opening spontaneously under high lateral forces, particularly at speeds below 9 mph (15 km/h). This can be dangerous for both the vehicle’s occupants and those outside, including pedestrians and nearby objects. The problem stems from water entering the printed circuit board within the door handle, leading to miscommunications with the door control unit.

Signs of the Malfunction

Drivers and passengers in the affected Volkswagen ID.4 models may notice an unusual clicking sound, similar to that of doors locking or unlocking, which can indicate the onset of this issue.

Timeline of the Volkswagen ID.4 Door Handle Issue

  • June 2021: The first signs of this issue in the Volkswagen ID.4 were reported in the U.S., with two cases of door openings. Investigations pointed to wiring harness damage as a cause of water ingress.
  • April 2022: Additional reports confirmed the presence of water in the circuit board.
  • April-November 2022: Volkswagen conducted in-depth analyses using malfunctioning parts, signal debugging, and accelerated aging tests.
  • November 2022: Tests on field vehicles identified the issue at speeds below 15 km/h.
  • January-February 2023: In collaboration with suppliers, Volkswagen analyzed and tested deconstructed field parts.
  • February 2023: Environmental tests commenced on serial parts to better understand the ingress of water.
  • February 28, 2023: The NHTSA called for a meeting with VWGoA to discuss the ID.4 door handle issue.
  • March 2023: Continued investigations by VWGoA and NHTSA, with no definitive root cause identified initially.
  • March 28, 2023: Completion of climate chamber tests led to the identification of the root cause.
  • April 2023: Volkswagen’s Product Safety Committee started identifying affected ID.4 vehicles.

Recall Decision and Implications

By April 26, 2023, Volkswagen’s Product Safety Committee had decided to recall the affected 2021-2023 ID.4 models, following 28 reported instances of door openings. This recall is a vital step in rectifying a crucial safety defect, highlighting the need for stringent quality control and proactive measures in the automotive industry.

Tesla has identified a significant safety issue affecting certain 2021-2023 Tesla Model S and Model X vehicles. The problem lies in the installation of incorrect steering wheel airbags during vehicle servicing. This issue predominantly arose during the retrofitting of vehicles with alternate steering wheels based on customer requests.

Discovery of the Issue

The problem came to Tesla’s attention in October 2023, when Tesla Service in Europe encountered 12 instances where vehicles with round steering wheels were retrofitted with yoke steering wheels. However, there was no confirmation of the appropriate driver airbag variant installation for the yoke steering wheels. This prompted Tesla to initiate an engineering study in the U.S., encompassing 10 vehicles. Of the three vehicles inspected, one was found to have the wrong driver airbag variant, meant for the round steering wheel.

The Nature of the Problem

At the core of this issue is the mismatch between the steering wheel design and the driver airbag variant. The round steering wheel and the yoke steering wheel each require a distinct driver airbag design. During servicing, some vehicles were erroneously equipped with a driver airbag variant mismatched to the steering wheel type. This discrepancy can potentially compromise airbag performance during deployment, elevating the risk of injury in the event of a collision.

Recall and Safety Concerns

As a result of these findings, Tesla decided to recall all vehicles that underwent a steering wheel retrofit – either from a round to a yoke steering wheel or vice versa. This decision underscores the potential safety risks associated with the airbag performance in these retrofitted vehicles.

Official Recall Information

Tesla has issued a recall with the number SB-23-20-005. Additionally, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has assigned the campaign number 23V-743 to this recall. This recall highlights the critical importance of matching the correct airbag variant to the specific design of a vehicle’s steering wheel.